Exodus 4:24-26 is one of the more enigmatic and intriguing passages in the Old Testament. It reads:
"At a lodging place on the way, the Lord met Moses and was about to kill him. But Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son’s foreskin and touched Moses’ feet with it. 'Surely you are a bridegroom of blood to me,' she said. So the Lord let him alone. (At that time she said 'bridegroom of blood,' referring to circumcision.)" (Exodus 4:24-26, NIV)
This passage, though brief, is dense with theological and cultural significance. To understand it fully, we must consider the broader context of the Book of Exodus, the covenantal traditions of Israel, and the immediate circumstances surrounding Moses' mission to liberate the Israelites from Egyptian bondage.
Context and Background
Moses had just encountered God in the burning bush (Exodus 3), where he was commissioned to lead the Israelites out of Egypt. God had given Moses signs to perform and had assured him of His divine support. However, as Moses set out on his journey back to Egypt with his family, this sudden and severe incident occurred.
The abrupt nature of the passage, where God seeks to kill Moses, seems contradictory considering the divine mission Moses had just received. This has led to various interpretations and much scholarly debate. However, a closer examination reveals several layers of meaning.
The Covenant of Circumcision
To understand the significance of this event, we must first consider the Abrahamic covenant, particularly the practice of circumcision, which was instituted as a sign of this covenant. In Genesis 17:10-14, God commands Abraham and his descendants to circumcise every male as a perpetual sign of the covenant between God and His people:
"This is my covenant with you and your descendants after you, the covenant you are to keep: Every male among you shall be circumcised. You are to undergo circumcision, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and you. For the generations to come every male among you who is eight days old must be circumcised, including those born in your household or bought with money from a foreigner—those who are not your offspring. Whether born in your household or bought with your money, they must be circumcised. My covenant in your flesh is to be an everlasting covenant. Any uncircumcised male, who has not been circumcised in the flesh, will be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant."
Circumcision was not merely a physical act but a deeply spiritual and communal one, signifying the individual's and the community's commitment to God. Failure to adhere to this covenantal sign was considered a severe breach of faith.
Moses’ Omission
Given the importance of circumcision, Moses' failure to circumcise his son was a significant oversight. This neglect could be seen as a breach of the covenant, which would render Moses unfit to lead God's people. The severity of God's reaction—seeking to kill Moses—underscores the gravity of this omission. It suggests that before Moses could fulfill his divine mission, he needed to rectify this covenantal breach.
Zipporah’s Intervention
Zipporah's quick action to circumcise her son and touch Moses' feet with the foreskin is both practical and symbolic. Her use of a flint knife echoes the ancient practice and highlights the urgency and seriousness of the situation. When she touches Moses' feet with the foreskin, she seems to be performing a ritual act that signifies Moses' inclusion in the covenant community, thereby averting God's wrath.
Her declaration, "Surely you are a bridegroom of blood to me," is a complex phrase. The term "bridegroom of blood" (Hebrew: חֲתַן-דָּמִים, chatan damim) has been interpreted in various ways. Some scholars suggest it refers to the blood of circumcision, linking Moses to the covenant through this act. Others see it as an expression of Zipporah's emotional and spiritual connection to Moses, solidified through this life-saving act.
Theological Implications
This passage highlights several key theological themes:
-
The Sanctity of the Covenant: The covenant between God and His people is paramount. Even Moses, chosen and commissioned by God, is not exempt from its requirements. This underscores the seriousness with which God views His covenants and the expectations He has for His people.
-
Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility: God's actions in this episode demonstrate His sovereignty and the seriousness of covenantal breaches. At the same time, Zipporah's intervention shows the vital role of human agency in fulfilling divine mandates. Her quick thinking and decisive action save Moses and enable him to continue his mission.
-
The Role of Family in Spiritual Life: Zipporah's role in this narrative highlights the importance of family in the spiritual life of leaders. Her understanding of the covenantal requirements and her willingness to act in a crisis situation are crucial to Moses' survival and mission. This suggests that spiritual leadership is not an isolated endeavor but involves the support and participation of one's family.
-
The Cost of Discipleship: The term "bridegroom of blood" and the act of circumcision point to the cost of being in a covenant relationship with God. It involves sacrifice, obedience, and sometimes painful actions. This prefigures the New Testament understanding of discipleship, where following Christ involves taking up one's cross (Luke 9:23).
Broader Biblical Resonance
This passage resonates with other biblical themes and narratives. For instance, the concept of blood as a sign of covenant and protection is echoed in the Passover narrative, where the blood of the lamb on the doorposts protects the Israelites from the angel of death (Exodus 12). Similarly, in the New Testament, the blood of Christ is seen as the ultimate sign of the new covenant, offering salvation and protection to believers (Hebrews 9:12-15).
Moreover, the idea of divine testing and the necessity of obedience before undertaking a divine mission is seen in other biblical figures. For example, Abraham's willingness to sacrifice Isaac (Genesis 22) and Jesus' temptation in the wilderness (Matthew 4) both emphasize the importance of faithfulness and obedience in fulfilling God's purposes.
Conclusion
Exodus 4:24-26, though brief, is a passage rich in theological and cultural significance. It underscores the importance of the covenant, the seriousness of divine mandates, and the role of human agency in fulfilling God's purposes. Zipporah's decisive action not only saves Moses but also reinforces the centrality of the covenant in the life of God's people.
This episode serves as a powerful reminder of the cost and commitment involved in being part of God's covenant community. It challenges us to take seriously our own covenantal commitments and to recognize the vital role of family and community in our spiritual journey. Through this enigmatic yet profound passage, we are invited to reflect on the depth of God's covenantal love and the seriousness with which He calls us to live in faithful obedience.
