Mark Ting
Chief Evangelist, Bible Chat
10 min read
In a recent and widely publicized event, former President Donald Trump demanded an apology from a Christian bishop who had called on him to show mercy toward marginalized communities, including immigrants and transgender youth. This clash, which some have referred to as the “Trump bishop apology” controversy, has sparked a significant debate about the nature of Christian compassion, the role of church leaders in public life, and how believers should approach hot-button social issues such as immigration and LGBTQ inclusion. It also raises a timely question: Is Christianity and mercy inseparable, and how should modern Christians respond when the call for compassion collides with political agendas?
Below, we delve into the theological foundations of Christian mercy, the political implications of speaking truth to power, and the responsibility of believers toward marginalized individuals. We will also examine why mercy lies at the core of the Gospel message and how Christians—both progressives and conservatives—can engage in constructive dialogue instead of deepening divides.
According to various news sources, this dispute began when the bishop, who was speaking at a national prayer service, directly addressed Donald Trump and pleaded with him to exercise mercy toward those who feel marginalized or threatened—particularly transgender individuals and undocumented immigrants. The bishop argued that many in these groups live in fear of discriminatory policies, hate crimes, or deportation. Far from delivering an inflammatory sermon, she spoke calmly and appealed to Christian teachings on compassion and justice.
Trump, however, publicly labeled her comments as “nasty” and “uncompelling,” demanding that she—and by extension, her church—issue an apology for challenging him. He described her plea as a political attack disguised as a prayer, while his supporters argued that she had misused the pulpit for partisan purposes. On the other side, many Christians, including clergy from various denominations, viewed the bishop’s statement as a profound act of Christian witness. They likened her to Old Testament prophets who often confronted kings and rulers, urging them to uphold mercy and justice for the vulnerable.
This heated exchange has since evolved into a broader discourse: How should Christians treat immigrants and LGBTQ people, and does urging mercy inherently cross into political territory—or is it simply a biblical imperative?
Scripture is replete with passages that emphasize God’s heart for the marginalized. In the Old Testament, the prophet Micah famously asks, “What does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God?” (Micah 6:8). This triad—justice, mercy, and humility—forms a core principle that has guided Jewish and Christian ethics for millennia.
Another foundational verse, Leviticus 19:34, calls on the people of Israel to treat the foreigner residing among them as if he or she were native-born. God’s people are commanded to love the stranger as themselves, recalling their own history as foreigners in Egypt. This instruction establishes a timeless precedent: our shared stories of displacement, suffering, and deliverance should lead us to empathize with others who find themselves in similarly vulnerable situations.
When we turn to the New Testament, Jesus’ ministry amplifies this theme of compassion:
One of the most potent illustrations is the Parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25–37). In this story, a Samaritan—a member of a group despised by Jesus’ Jewish audience—proves to be the true neighbor when he stops to aid an injured traveler after others have passed by. The parable underscores that genuine love disregards social, ethnic, or religious boundaries. Mercy, by Jesus’ definition, is not limited to those we deem morally or legally upright. It extends to anyone in need.
The Apostles took Jesus’ words seriously. In James 2:13, the early Christian leader warns believers that “judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful,” concluding with the powerful statement that “mercy triumphs over judgment.” This does not dismiss the importance of moral discernment but emphasizes that God’s grace, embodied by Christ, should be mirrored in how we treat others.
In short, the Bible describes a God who not only commands compassion but also personifies it through Christ’s sacrificial life. The call to “love your neighbor as yourself” (Mark 12:31) is integrally linked to the Christian mission, urging believers to stand with the vulnerable—whether they are immigrants, refugees, or members of the LGBTQ community.
Historically, the Church’s track record on mercy has been mixed. On the one hand, Christians have engaged in extraordinary acts of charity: establishing hospitals, feeding the poor, and offering sanctuary to political refugees. For instance, the Sanctuary Movement of the 1980s saw churches openly defy federal immigration law to protect refugees fleeing violence in Central America. These communities believed they were living out the biblical injunction to welcome the stranger, even when it collided with government policy.
On the other hand, Christian communities have also perpetuated injustices. From complicity in the Atlantic slave trade to institutional homophobia, the Church has sometimes aligned itself with oppressive structures rather than challenging them. This duality underscores a central tension: Christians have the potential to be powerful agents of mercy, but they can also succumb to cultural, political, or institutional pressures that prioritize stability over compassion.
The “Trump bishop apology” episode reflects this tension: one can see it either as the Church nobly calling out a political leader to uphold Christian virtues or as an unfortunate entanglement of faith with partisan aims. The question remains: When do we speak up, and at what cost?
A key criticism of the bishop’s remarks is that she brought politics into the pulpit. Yet, biblical prophets often addressed political leaders directly, rebuking them for neglecting the widow, the orphan, or the foreigner. In Jeremiah, for example, the prophet repeatedly confronts the king and his advisors about issues of injustice. Similarly, John the Baptist fearlessly condemned Herod’s moral failings—an act that ultimately cost him his life.
Is compassion political? Not necessarily. While politics can shape how laws and policies are made, mercy is a theological virtue that precedes all governmental systems. Indeed, many Christian leaders argue it becomes political only insofar as it challenges social norms, laws, or leaders who neglect the vulnerable. When the bishop publicly requested compassion for immigrants and transgender individuals, she was following a long line of Christian teaching rather than endorsing a specific legislative agenda. By asking for empathy rather than endorsing a particular candidate or bill, she leaned on Christian principles rather than partisan politics.
That said, the modern political climate often conflates moral imperatives with political endorsements. Critics may see any mention of immigration reform, LGBTQ rights, or social justice as an attack on conservative ideals or as a covert promotion of progressive ideology. However, one can argue that Christians concerned with social justice are simply putting Scripture’s mandates into practice, rather than advancing a particular party platform.
Beyond the immediate controversy lies a broader theological question: How should Christians treat immigrants and LGBTQ people? Here are key considerations from a faith-based perspective:
The Trump vs. the Bishop incident reveals fault lines within modern Christianity, often split into “progressive” vs. “conservative” camps:
The reality is far more nuanced than a simple dichotomy. Many Christians identify with certain conservative doctrines but hold progressive views on social welfare. Others are socially conservative yet remain compassionate about specific immigration issues. Indeed, bridging these divides often involves acknowledging shared biblical ground—like the universal call to love—and respectfully negotiating different applications of Scripture to modern contexts.
Whether one agrees or disagrees with the bishop’s approach, the controversy serves as an invitation to revisit how the Church can embody Christianity and mercy in a polarized world. Here are a few steps faith communities might consider:
The “Trump bishop apology” incident, while controversial, offers a potent reminder that Christians concerned with social justice occupy a long and venerable tradition. From Moses’ defense of the Hebrew slaves to Jesus’ embrace of lepers and outcasts, God’s people have repeatedly been called to champion the vulnerable—even if that stance unsettles the powerful.
How should Christians treat immigrants and LGBTQ people? The consistent message across Scripture is love. Whether one adheres to a conservative or progressive theology, the biblical imperatives to “welcome the stranger,” “love your neighbor,” and “be merciful as your Father is merciful” remain. This does not mean discarding convictions about holiness or justice. Rather, it means placing compassion at the forefront of how we interpret and apply those convictions.
In times of intense polarization, many believers fear the Church will lose its prophetic voice if it remains silent; others fear it will lose its unity if it speaks too boldly. But the overarching witness of Scripture shows that mercy is not an optional extra, nor is it a political tool. It is the heartbeat of the Christian faith.
For those who stand with the bishop, her plea embodies the essence of the Gospel: that anyone feeling forgotten, despised, or marginalized should encounter the radical hospitality of Christ through His followers. For those who side with Trump, this controversy may serve as a wake-up call to carefully examine where political loyalty ends and kingdom values begin.
In the end, Christ’s words ring true: “By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another” (John 13:35). Love is the greatest apologetic for Christianity. When faced with real human suffering, the Church can either respond with open arms and hearts or cling to partisan allegiances. The choice is ours, and the example of Jesus—who consistently took the side of the vulnerable—gives us a clear direction.
If you’re looking for deeper insights into Christianity and mercy, or you want to explore what Scripture teaches about how Christians should treat immigrants and LGBTQ people, consider exploring the Bible Chat app. With Bible Chat, you can:
Join thousands of users across the globe who are discovering fresh ways to connect with the Bible and deepen their faith. Download Bible Chat from the App Store or Google Play, or chat with us on WhatsApp. Be part of a community seeking wisdom, compassion, and the heart of God—no matter where you stand on the political or theological spectrum.
In a world where “mercy for the marginalized” can become a controversial stance, let’s remember that, for followers of Christ, compassion is not just policy—it’s a cornerstone of the Gospel.